Demo Fictitious data, reset automatically (next reset in 2 h 59). No e-mail is ever sent. Switch profile Back to website
Past event (April 1–2, 2026) — website kept as an archive.
CIUSNApril 1–2, 2026 · Cergy

Rationale

Scientific rationale

Generative AI has entered students' daily lives within months: information seeking, note-taking, writing, revising. Its rapid adoption raises questions research is only beginning to document: what happens to sustained attention, working memory and the ability to evaluate information when part of intellectual work is delegated to a machine?

Contributions are expected from communication and information science, education and cognitive psychology. They may address observed uses, training schemes, institutional policies or research methods, drawing on varied fieldwork, especially in French-speaking countries.

Thematic tracks

Track 1

Track description.

Track 2

Track description.

Track 3

Track description.

References

Generative AI has entered students' daily lives within months: information seeking, note-taking, writing, revising. Its rapid adoption raises questions research is only beginning to document: what happens to sustained attention, working memory and the ability to evaluate information when part of intellectual work is delegated to a machine?

Contributions are expected from communication and information science, education and cognitive psychology. They may address observed uses, training schemes, institutional policies or research methods, drawing on varied fieldwork, especially in French-speaking countries.